The Trump-Johnson Secret

"He and I have a secret. We’ll tell you what it is when the race is over." ~President Trump

Like a lot of people, I was surprised by how easily we slid past the November 5th election. Would some unforeseen event postpone it? Would they steal it again? Would it take weeks to declare a winner? Like a balloon slowly losing air, the election came and went, President Trump was declared the winner, Kamala conceded, and the nomination process has begun. Life goes on.

Disclosure of our government’s corruption is necessary. I've spent years impatiently waiting for the event that would jolt my fellow Americans into reality. It still shocks me to think of how much has happened and how many are still unaware. The changes to our government have been monumental. America was literally pulled back from the ledge of socialism. Yet some people are still oblivious to it.

The years prior to 2016 were gut-wrenching. Our voices were silenced and any control we thought we had over our government was completely removed. We became more stressed, overworked, and hopeless. Elected officials patronized us, reminding us that we had no say over the events shaping our country. Their arrogance was infuriating. It didn’t matter if we protested, wrote letters, showed up and shouted at them that they worked for us, they didn’t care. They had an agenda, and we weren’t part of it.

There are still many Americans who aren’t aware that a change has taken place. I don’t know if I admire them or resent them. They’ve cluelessly gone about their lives, indifferent to the historical events we’re emerging from. They missed out on the predictions that didn’t materialize; the anxiety, fear, and disappointment we’ve all felt. But they’re also missing out on the excitement of knowing the history behind President Trump’s nominees. They’re missing out on the hope and relief that we’re finally starting to feel. Will they miss out on understanding exactly how America will be made Great Again? Will they recognize that they’ve been brainwashed by Marxists who convinced them that America was never great?

I owe a debt of gratitude to Patrick Gunnels for encouraging me to start this Substack. Documenting my thoughts and putting them to paper has helped me so much. Already I look back at some of my papers and can recognize how much my ideas and opinions have changed.

My most popular papers are The Only Way is the Military and IP Addresses. This gives me comfort knowing that others are hoping for disclosure, and they want to see it on the same grand scale that I do. I don’t know how we get on the same page without it. Americans need to accept responsibility for what happened in our country, and for what the future brings. We need confidence in our election system and to know that our vote matters. We need to hold our elected officials accountable and demand that they represent us. No longer should we tolerate massive, thousand-page bills full of political favoritism to benefit corrupt politicians while burdening us with higher taxes. Never again should we feel that our vote doesn’t matter, and we have no say over how our government is run. It's impossible for us to get there with things as they are now.

My faith in meaningful disclosure remains, but my expectations keep changing. What I thought was going to be a globe shaking event prior to the election never happened. I was certain the disclosure would come while people thought Biden was President. While many think the scare event will be a threat by a foreign entity – or maybe drones – I wonder what makes people think the Deep State still has any power. To me, the scare event will be the attention-grabbing shock of disclosure. It’s necessary to scare people into paying attention.

January will hold two important events for the future of our country. My thoughts have been all over the place. I’ve gone from wondering if we would see a repeat of January 6th, or maybe something would happen on January 20th. My original goal in writing this paper was to say that I changed my mind, and the disclosure won’t come in January. The election certification will be uneventful. January 6th will come and go. The inauguration will be uneventful. January 20th will come and go. Once President Trump is sworn in, he will get to work on exposing the corruption, cleaning out the government, and making America great again. That’s where I thought this was headed.

In the middle of writing this the conspiracy theories started working their way into my thoughts. As I was jerked back to reality, time stood still, and thoughts flooded into my mind. It started with a thought about President Trump’s inauguration in 2016. That was the first inauguration I ever watched. I knew something was different then. Suddenly thoughts of his 2024 inauguration came to mind and I started to wonder what it would look like. Then it hit me. Are Joe and Jill Biden going to be there? What about Barack and Michelle? Bill and Hillary? George and Laura? Past Presidents attend the inauguration of the newly elected President. What happens when our past presidents are all treasonous traitors? It’s not just a mutual dislike between politicians. The Bidens, Obamas, Clintons, and Bushes sold out our country for their personal gain. If I still believe that none of them have maintained their freedom, and they are confined in some way, how can they attend President Trump’s inauguration?

In August, a video was circulating of Congressman Jamie Raskin’s appearance at a panel in February where he discussed not allowing President Trump to take office due to his involvement in the insurrection that wasn’t. In that discussion, Raskin says that it’s going to be up to Congress on January 6, 2025, to tell the “rampaging Trump mobs” that he’s disqualified. He said that they’ll need bodyguards for everyone, and it will be Civil War conditions. This was a bold statement meant to provide reminders of what happened during the last certification. In addition to being a member of Congress, Jamie Raskin is a constitutional lawyer who served as the lead manager in President Trump’s second impeachment trial and also served as a member of the J6 committee.

Jamie Raskin is also a proponent of eliminating the Electoral College, describing it as “anti-democratic, anti-majoritarian,” and a threat to democracy.

Right around the November election, a post appeared on X that quoted Jamie Raskin as saying, “Let folks cast their votes for Trump if that’s their choice. But mark my words, we won’t be certifying the election. He might win, but we’ll ensure he doesn’t step foot in the Oval Office.” Raskin denied making the statement and posted to his X account that the fictional quote was 100% fabricated.

The post was shared through the media and fact checkers were quick to jump on its inaccuracy. This comment, whether false or not, combined with Raskin’s February remarks mentioning Civil War conditions made me wonder if we are being given a clue that January 6 may be more impactful than I originally thought.

The movie War Game was released to streaming services this month (December). The documentary takes place on January 6, 2025, and follows a group of defense, intelligence, and elected officials role-playing an insurrection as members of the military defect to support the losing candidate (assuming they’re referring to President Trump). The resurfacing of the video of Jamie Raskin’s Civil War analogy, a fake post about him refusing to certify the election, and a movie about an insurrection causes me to wonder if Ghosts in the Machine are prepping us for what’s to come.

Is it possible we’ll see a sequel to J6?

Refusing to certify elections didn’t begin with the 2020 election. On January 6, 2017, Jamie Raskin (and others) objected to President Trump’s certification in the 2016 election. At that time, then-Vice President Joe Biden denied the objections because they weren’t procedurally accurate. This NPR link contains a video of President Trump’s lawyers at his impeachment hearing showing members of Congress objecting to the certification of the 2016 election.

Knowing that our elections are fake, and knowing that President Trump repeatedly warned us that the election would be rigged, what would happen if a member of Congress knowingly certified the election results? President Trump is a Law-and-Order President. Wouldn’t it be hypocritical of him to expect members of Congress to certify the election after he’s been telling us for years that our elections are rigged?

We may very well see a sequel to J6 in the context of refusing to certify the election. Only it won’t be Democrats objecting to the certification. It will be Republicans.

Our current system allows for state electors to certify the results of an election, which are considered final under the Constitution. However, members of Congress have the right to object to the certification on January 6th. A member of both the House and Senate must vote to approve an objection, and both Houses must agree in order to overturn the states’ electors.

If both Houses agree and reject a state's electoral votes, those votes are not counted. If the votes in enough states are rejected, and neither candidate reaches the required 270 electoral votes, it could trigger a contingent election. In a contingent election, the House of Representatives would choose the President as described by the 12th Amendment. Each state is allowed to cast one vote to choose between the candidates.

This has happened twice before in 1800, when Thomas Jefferson was elected, and 1824, when John Quincy Adams was elected.

Is this the secret between President Trump and Speaker Johnson that he referred to at his Madison Square Garden Rally?

"He and I have a secret," Trump said. "We’ll tell you what it is when the race is over." Mike Johnson was one of the 147 Republicans in Congress who voted to reject the outcome of the 2020 election. My guess is that he knew the 2020 election was fraudulent, and he probably knows that 2024 is also fraudulent. Is Speaker Johnson coordinating the efforts toward a contingent election for President Trump?

New York Representative Daniel Goldman is an attorney who served as lead counsel in President Trump’s first impeachment hearing. In an interview with People, Goldman said that he thinks the secret is a pact with Mike Johnson to overturn the election on January 6 as a back-up plan if Kamala won. What if the pact is actually a plan to trap them all in a wide net of corruption when they vote to certify a fraudulent election?

President Trump’s encouraging us to get out and vote in large numbers make sense. During his election night victory speech, President Trump said, “America has given us an unprecedented and powerful mandate.” In the 2024 election, he became only the second republican to win the popular vote since 1988. He knew they were going to rig the election again, and he wanted Congress to be confident in denying the electors’ votes while still speaking for the people.

YouTube contains countless videos of commentators explaining that there is no need to worry about a repeat of January 6, 2021, because “our side won.” These people have no idea what is coming. If a contingent election is the secret between President Trump and Speaker Johnson (and I believe it is), I think this is the “Go” signal that we’ve been waiting for.

With a clear conscious and a valid victory behind him, President Trump can move forward with his agenda which will begin with fixing our corrupt election system. Since power over elections falls to the States, it’s time to shine the light on the secretaries of state, states’ attorneys, and governors for their role, if any, in election fraud.

This is just the beginning. The Best is Yet to Come!