Global Justice Warriors

“All warfare is based on deception.” ~Sun Tzu

I recently noticed a lot of anti-Pompeo posts on social media, which struck me as odd since I thought he’d been out of the news cycle for a while. Apparently, some media person started posting that Trump was considering Pompeo for a position in his new Administration. This started a rage among people posting that Pompeo was either a ‘war hawk,’ part of the Deep State, or a member of the military industrial complex.

In addition to the anti-Pompeo social media posts, an April discussion between Joe Rogan and Tucker Carlson resurfaced. Tucker discusses the declassification of President Kennedy’s assassination and accuses Pompeo of preventing the release of the files. With no fear of potential legal repercussions, Tucker slanders Pompeo by accusing him of being a sinister person and a criminal. The accusation stems from a Yahoo News article in which journalist Mike Isakov reported that, according to sources, Pompeo attempted to assassinate WikiLeaks Founder, Julian Assange (2:48).

If Mike Pompeo wanted Julian Assange killed, why isn’t he dead? Why didn’t they kill Assange before he released the CIA secrets in the WikiLeaks Vault 7 files? Why would the CIA discuss an assassination, and then tell a journalist about it after they decide against it? Why is the Rogan-Tucker podcast circulating again? What was Tucker’s intention in defaming Mike Pompeo? What is the reason for promoting a negative view of Mike Pompeo? Something seems off about this.

More importantly, why am I listening to what Tucker Carlson has to say? When did Tucker Carlson’s reporting become credible? I like Tucker and he seems to be joining in The Great Awakening, but when did Tucker Carlson become a trusted name in news? No one in the media has earned the right to be considered trustworthy, in my opinion.

As I often remind myself, we are living through an Information War. The more someone wants me to lean in one direction, the more I resist and lean the other direction. I’m not trying to be obstinate. It’s important for me to consider all sides and to trust my instincts. The more attention a story gets, the less I believe it.  

In addition to the Rogan interview, #NoPompeo started trending on X/Twitter. Jack Posobiec posted the following:

Below is an example of some of the comments under Jack’s Tweet:

Why do people think they’re smarter than President Trump? The Great Awakening still has a long way to go if people commenting on social media think he should be listening to us.

All of the #NoPompeo followers can breathe a sigh of relief now that President Trump shut down any chance of Mike Pompeo’s potential role in his new Administration:

My guess is that we won’t hear any more of Mike Pompeo until the time is right.

Like so many others in President Trump’s circle, Mike Pompeo worked toward publicly putting space between himself and the President. In 2023, Pompeo criticized Trump for being in possession of classified documents when he shouldn’t have had them, and for not returning them when given the opportunity. “That’s inconsistent with protecting America’s soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines,” said Pompeo. Being the loyal supporters that we are, many of us immediately turned on Pompeo in the interest of protecting President Trump.

Maybe Mike Pompeo is a war hawk, a member of the Deep State or the military industrial complex. Anything is possible. However, when I think of Mike Pompeo, I immediately go back to the first time I heard of him, well before Trump’s Presidency. It was during the House Select Committee hearing on the Benghazi tragedy, and it left a lasting and favorable impression on me. Watch any YouTube video of his questioning of Hillary Clinton. Not only will you notice her obvious discomfort, but his demeanor makes it clear that he doesn’t hold the former Secretary of State in very high regard. In that moment, I felt a strong admiration for Mike Pompeo. That feeling remains.

Should we continue to assume that President Trump made a mistake with Pompeo? He appointed him to be the CIA Director, and then nominated him to be Secretary of State. President Trump isn’t just a New York businessman who happened to fall into the Presidency. His role in our country has been a well-planned operation. How could he have been wrong about Mike Pompeo? I don’t think he was.

Mike Pompeo was an intelligent, loyal, and trusted addition to the Trump Administration. He graduated first in his class at West Point, served five years in the Army, worked as an attorney until 1998, and then became an entrepreneur in the aerospace and oilfield industries. Before serving as the CIA Director and Secretary of State, he was elected to the House of Representatives in 2011 to represent the State of Kansas.

Although he was originally a critic of Donald Trump, he became one of his most loyal supporters after President Trump’s nomination in 2017. According to The New Yorker in 2019, no matter what Trump has said or done, Pompeo has stood by him. As a former White House official said, “There will never be any daylight publicly between him and Trump.”

The affection between the two men is mutual, as the New Yorker journalist says Trump often gushes about Pompeo. “I argue with everyone,” Trump told a reporter. “Except Pompeo.”

While Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo hosted about two dozen "Madison dinners" for hundreds of attendees. The dinners weren’t on Pompeo's public schedule and contact information for each attendee was sent to Pompeo's wife's personal email address, rather than his State Department email. The invitees included diplomats or foreign officials, members of the media, entertainment industry, or corporate world, and members from U.S. politics or government. The dinners were said to be "a world-class opportunity to discuss the mission of the State Department and the complex foreign policy matters facing our exceptional nation."

There was no communication between Pompeo's office and the teams at the State Department who handle different regions of the world. For example, if the South Korean ambassador attended a Madison Dinner, the bureau responsible for South Korea might not even know about it or have the ability to follow up on what was discussed between Pompeo and the ambassador. Maybe that was the point. Could these dinners have provided a setting for unofficial conversations with foreign officials centered around global concerns?

A January 15, 2021 AP article reported that Pompeo wasn’t going to quietly fade away. Not only was he defending President Trump after the January 6 insurrection that wasn’t, but he was also issuing orders to State Department employees and Tweeting on both his official and personal accounts to promote President Trump’s America First Agenda. When asked if there would be a smooth transition to the Biden administration, Pompeo responded, “There will be a smooth transition to a second Trump administration, all right. We're ready. The world is watching what's taking place here.”

Pompeo saying, “The world is watching,” is an interesting choice of words.

According to ChatGPT, the U.S. Secretary of State serves as the President’s top adviser on foreign affairs. He or she represents the U.S. in international organizations like the United Nations, NATO, and the World Trade Organization. The Secretary is responsible for leading diplomatic talks with other countries on key areas like national security, defense, trade, and human rights. They also play a vital role in negotiating, drafting, and signing international treaties and agreements.

Our world has been filled with corruption. There are two branches to that corruption – domestic, meaning within our borders, and international, meaning outside of our borders. The domestic corruption includes members of our government, entertainment industry, media, corporations, and others. These areas need to be restructured, and the criminals responsible for destroying our institutions must be brought to justice. There are people from Trump’s first administration that have disappeared from the spotlight, and I believe they are working behind the scenes to bring justice back to our country. These people include Jeff Sessions, John Ratcliffe, Mark Meadows, and others.

The second major branch represents international corruption and includes supporters of the New World Order, members of NATO, whoever was behind Covid, and other issues - all of the problems that need attention beyond our borders, internationally or worldwide. These institutions also need to be restructured, and those criminals must also be brought to justice.

Who better to represent the United States and work with the International Court of Justice in a global prosecution of international criminals than Mike Pompeo, our former Secretary of State, along with Nikki Haley, our former Ambassador to the United Nations? As I mentioned in Global Justice, both of them came out very strongly against the UN Human Rights Council. We were conditioned to hate Nikki Haley due to her clownish, half-hearted campaign for President, along with rumors of her being a war hawk, neocon, etc. Is that true, or were we once again distracted and misled so that she too could focus on a more important project? That project being the takedown of international criminals?

As UN Ambassador, Nikki Haley was the primary representative of the United States to the United Nations during President Trump’s first term. The UN Ambassador plays an important role in advancing American foreign policy worldwide, as well as working with other UN members to draft, sponsor, and negotiate resolutions on international matters. The Ambassador engages with other diplomats and foreign ministers to promote U.S. interests and encourage cooperation on global issues. Global issues like international corruption.

As UN Ambassador, Nikki Haley reported directly to both President Trump and Mike Pompeo. In an Information War, would you be surprised if you were misled into believing that the former Secretary of State and UN Ambassador were working against the President? Would you turn against them and become disinterested in them and their roles? Is this part of the distraction? Were we supposed to become disillusioned with Pompeo and Haley so that they could continue to do more important work, outside of our attention?

I continue to trust President Trump, and I trust that justice is coming. In Global Justice, I theorize that we are not thinking big enough and we will someday see international trials similar to The Nuremberg Trials that were held after World War II. Did President Trump announce that Pompeo and Haley are not going to be part of his Administration because they have bigger, more historic work to do, on a global scale?

Only time will tell.