Exposing Election Fraud

"The only way we’re going to lose this election is if the election is rigged, remember that." ~President Trump, August 17, 2020

There’s nothing like a let’s-get-the-ball-rolling speech by the President to wake us weary Trump supporters. The President’s election interference speech this week felt like a signal that the disclosures are about to begin. Everything centers around our elections.

Exposing Election Fraud was written in May 2025 and serves as the perfect example of why I chose to start writing. Documenting what is happening as it’s happening helps me remember things I would have otherwise forgotten. This paper provides a reminder and a deeper dive into some of the topics surrounding the fraud in our elections. It discusses vote switching by the super computer at the Chinese funded Penn-Biden Center, the questionable actions behind Michigan’s election fraud and the actions of its government, Executive Orders calling out Chris Krebs and Miles Taylor, and other important pieces to the election fraud puzzle.

History has a way of making old stories new again, and this paper does exactly that.

We’ve watched headlines come and go while we expected something big to come from them. As quickly as they appeared, they drifted out of focus without any resolution. We’ve learned to deal with disappointment, while trying to remain hopeful. Of all the stories we’ve lived through, our biggest disappointment was probably the stolen election in 2020.

The chapter on the stolen election and the fraud surrounding it isn't closed. In fact, it seems to be quietly resurfacing, and I think it’s going to be back in the spotlight in a big way.

Elections are the foundation for the change that we need in this country. Those changes can’t happen without everyone understanding how fraudulent our election system is. If most of Congress weren’t legitimately elected, any laws they pass are invalid. We need Congress to pass laws to restructure our financial system, eliminate taxes, and abolish federal agencies, among other things. None of this can be achieved through Executive Orders. Lasting change requires legislation. This is something our current illegitimate Congress is incapable of accomplishing.

Will our fraudulent elections be corrected through legal and procedural reforms, or will they be exposed in a way that leaves no room for doubt? I’m not content with putting the 2020 election behind us and moving forward. No one should be. We want our pound of flesh. We don’t know how elections will be fixed or how the fraud will be exposed, but things have been put into motion that lead me to believe that it’s coming.

Antrim County, Michigan

It’s probably safe to say that most people were aware of the election anomalies in Arizona and Georgia. The election fraud in those two states became mainstream news when their audits began. Were the election anomalies in little Antrim County, Michigan as mainstream?

Antrim County has always been a reliably Republican County. When the unofficial 2020 election results showed Biden leading President Trump in a landslide, suspicions were raised. After a review was conducted, the inaccurate vote total was reported as a clerical error, but it fueled stories of voter fraud. The error occurred when the County Clerk failed to update the election system software after a last-minute change to the ballots. A candidate was added, but not all of the ballot scanners were updated. This caused the system to misinterpret vote counts when combining precinct totals. The votes weren’t lining up correctly, which led to the incorrect vote totals.

A University of Michigan voting systems expert conducted a forensic investigation at the request of Michigan’s Secretary of State and Attorney General. His report, released in March 2021, attributed the issue to human error, not software or machine failure. The report debunked claims of fraud or hacking. Rudy Giuliani and Sidney Powell brought attention to the error as a way to question election integrity. President Trump brought it up during his January 6, 2021 speech when he said, “…there is the highly troubling matter of Dominion Voting Systems. In one Michigan county alone, 6,000 votes were switched from Trump to Biden and the same systems are used in the majority of states in our country.”

Time Magazine wrote a heartwarming story reminiscent of Norman Rockwell about what happened in Antrim County, Michigan. It’s a good article and entertaining to read, but is it accurate? Were the incorrect vote totals solely human error or could they have been combined with automated vote switching? One thing is certain, whether human error or machine manipulation, our elections have problems.

The unofficial results were corrected, and President Trump was declared the winner of Antrim County after a full hand recount. An unsuccessful candidate for Michigan Attorney General filed a lawsuit calling for a full forensic audit of the 2020 election. Like so many other courts, the Michigan Supreme Court rejected the lawsuit. There has not been a verified, credible and accepted investigation into the elections in any area of the country.

When Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer came back into the picture this year it reminded me of the Antrim County story. Why was the Michigan Governor, who had a contentious relationship with President Trump, suddenly showing up in the Oval Office? Is our attention being drawn to Michigan for a reason? Could the truth of election fraud begin in that state?

Whitmer’s response to Covid was not popular among the people of Michigan. They were one of the first to begin staging large ‘anti-lockdown’ protests. Like other Democrat governors, she used the pandemic as an excuse to lock down her state and blame President Trump. In an interview on MSNBC in March 2020, she criticized the federal government’s lack of preparedness. Within minutes of that interview, President Trump responded with a Tweet:

There is no shortage of stories of the conflict between President Trump and Governor Whitmer in 2020. Rather than granting her respect for her position, he referred to as “the woman in Michigan.” The feud between them continued and President Trump kept up his Twitter attacks:

It was shortly after this Twitter fight that the kidnapping plot against Governor Whitmer took place.

On April 30, 2020, a group of armed men “stormed the Capitol building” in Michigan which the media compared to the storming of the Capitol in Washington, D.C. on January 6th. The drama surrounding the kidnapping plot sounded fake to me, even though it resulted in the arrest of 14 men. During their trial, stories emerged that the plot was fabricated by FBI agents. No surprise there. Governor Whitmer blamed President Trump saying his rhetoric was a rallying cry for domestic terrorist groups. It sounded like a set up.

The tension between President Trump and Governor Whitmer seems to have cooled down. President Trump speaks approvingly of her now, although Whitmer doesn’t want anyone to know that they’re buddies. In an Oval Office meeting with President Trump in April, Whitmer hid her face behind a folder which did nothing but bring more attention to her. Was that the point? This wasn’t the first time she and her new friend appeared together. In February, President Trump selected her to sit next to him at the Governor’s Ball. Stepping off Air Force One in Michigan for a rally commemorating his 100th day in office, Whitmer was the first person in line to greet him. When she reached out to shake his hand, President Trump pulled her in for a hug.

Did something happen between Whitmer and President Trump? Is she going to play a more prominent role in the Make America Great Again movie? Will the State of Michigan play a part in uncovering election fraud? Will Whitmer and the State of Michigan be the first domino to fall in the election fraud unveiling?

The Superheroes Saving Our Democracy

The reemergence of Whitmer and Michigan aren’t the only repurposed stories surrounding the fraudulent 2020 election. In April, President Trump issued two first-of-their-kind directives naming individuals who played a role in his first term.

Addressing Risks from Chris Krebs and Government Censorship refers to the former head of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), and the person who declared the 2020 election “the most secure in American history.” The Presidential Memoranda accuses Krebs of using his position for political purposes, and censoring speech regarding the 2020 election and Covid. The directive accuses Krebs of labeling conservative views as disinformation, and pressuring social media platforms to censor those views. It also accuses him of hiding the story of Hunter Biden's laptop and dismissing concerns about election fraud.

On the surface, the Memo appears to focus on free speech and censorship. It accuses Krebs of being a insignificant bad-faith actor who abused his government authority. What stands out though is, “Krebs, through CISA, falsely and baselessly denied that the 2020 election was rigged and stolen, including by inappropriately and categorically dismissing widespread election malfeasance and serious vulnerabilities with voting machines.”

Presidential documents are entered into the Federal Register for eternity. The President of the United States is telling us that Chris Krebs falsely and baselessly denied that the 2020 election was rigged and stolen. The 2020 election was rigged and stolen. Although President Trump was shouting it from the rooftops after the 2020 election, he is now saying it in an official document and placing it in the federal register. Would he do that if it weren’t true? Should we believe that we won’t learn the truth behind the 2020 election? President Trump is giving us a clear message here. It’s only a matter of time.

In addition to embarrassing the hell out of Krebs, the Memo directs the revocation of Krebs’ security clearance, as well as the security clearance of anyone associated with him, including SentinelOne. Krebs was the Chief Intelligence and Public Policy Officer for the cybersecurity company. After this memo was issued, Krebs resigned from SentinelOne.

The memo also directs the review of his position as a government employee, including his conduct as the leader of CISA. It is to determine whether he violated any guidelines for federal employees or if he was involved in the unauthorized release of classified information. It also directs a comprehensive evaluation of CISA’s activities over the last six years, focusing on conduct that may have gone against Executive Order 14149. That EO describes the government’s previous practice of violating First Amendment rights by pressuring social media platforms to label content as disinformation. If CISA directed X or Facebook or any other social media platform to suppress conservative viewpoints, they will be in violation of this Executive Order. Not only is election fraud going to be uncovered, so is the censorship we were all victim to.

After all of the reviews are completed, a report will be delivered to President Trump with recommendations for action. I’m not sure when the report will be released, but I wonder if there will be a cascade of information released at the same time.

The second document released in April was a Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Addresses Risks Associated with Miles Taylor, a former employee of the Department of Homeland Security. Taylor is best known for his Anonymous Op Ed published in the September 2018 New York Times titled, “I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration.” It amuses me that another Trump-deranged pompous fool had his name entered into the Federal Register by the President of the United States.

Reading through Taylor’s Op Ed gave me the biggest sense of secondhand embarrassment I’ve ever experienced. Taylor must have felt empowered and righteous writing this article. It’s likely he never imagined that President Trump would finish his first term and serve a second term where he would order an investigation into Taylor and his activities. I wonder if Taylor is feeling empowered and righteous these days.

One of my biggest pet peeves, something that nearly enrages me, is when smug nobodies who have never accomplished anything of substance in their lives refer to President Trump as ‘Mr. Trump.’ John Brennan used to do it. It’s disrespectful, arrogant, and exposes the smallness of people. Taylor refers to President Trump as Mr. Trump in this article while he praises John McCain. He’s clearly a devoted fanboy of the Deep State.

Miles Taylor’s arrogance was highlighted in the following statement from his Op Ed:

“It may be cold comfort in this chaotic era, but Americans should know that there are adults in the room. We fully recognize what is happening. And we are trying to do what’s right even when Donald Trump won’t.”

It’s funny that this pompous fool thought he was smarter than President Trump and aligned himself with the “adults in the room.” He was clearly mistaken when he said, “We fully recognize what is happening.” I’m pretty confident that he actually did not recognize what was happening. It’s kind of funny, isn’t it?

Like Krebs, Miles Taylor and any individuals associated with him had their security clearance revoked. The Fact Sheet calls out the University of Pennsylvania, where Taylor taught an undergraduate class in 2023. A Penn law school professor whined that, “Every security clearance held by someone at the University of Pennsylvania has now apparently been suspended because the current occupant of the Oval Office is angry at a public critic named Miles Taylor.”

It struck me as odd that the University of Pennsylvania would be targeted in this Fact Sheet, so I started digging around and I was reminded of the many coincidences surrounding the University of Pennsylvania:

• President Trump attended The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania. He touted his relationship with his alma mater during the 2016 and 2020 elections but interestingly distanced himself from the school during the 2024 election.

• Elon Musk also attended The Wharton School at the University of Pennsylvania.

• The Penn Biden Center is a research unit of the University of Pennsylvania located in Washington DC, opened in 2018, and named after Joe Biden. The Penn Biden Center served as an office for Joe Biden prior to his presidency.

• The University of Pennsylvania received more than $30 million from Chinese donors shortly after the Penn Biden Center was announced.

• The Penn Biden Center was embroiled in controversy when the FBI discovered Joe Biden had stored classified documents there.

• The University of Pennsylvania is home to the United States first supercomputer.

Shortly after the 2020 election, FactCheck.org claimed, “Bogus Theory Claims Supercomputer Switched Votes in Election.” We know not to trust FactCheck.org, but finding that it is a project of the University of Pennsylvania was interesting. Even more interesting was finding that The University of Pennsylvania housed the country’s first supercomputer. This reminded me of the story of a supercomputer switching votes from Trump to Biden in the 2020 election. Suddenly, the connection to Miles Taylor and the University of Pennsylvania made sense.

After the 2020 election, reports began surfacing of CIA/DoD whistleblower, Dennis Montgomery, who designed and built the Hammer and Scorecard system. In sworn testimony to the FBI and DOJ in 2015, Montgomery told officials that individuals with access to the Hammer supercomputer could use the Scorecard application to hack into election systems and change election outcomes. Sidney Powell and Rudy Giuliani appeared on several media outlets bringing awareness to Hammer and Scorecard. On Lou Dobbs Tonight and Maria Bartiromo’s Fox News show, Powell claimed that the software switched votes from Trump to Biden. Apparently, 2020 wasn’t the first time Hammer and Scorecard was used. It was also reportedly used to cement Obama’s win in 2012.

Media programs began to mock the story of a secret supercomputer named "Hammer," and the software program "Scorecard," and the theory that they were used to alter election results in favor of Joe Biden. The claims that the system was secretly changing votes in key swing states were debunked by several organizations, including CISA, who called the theory “nonsense” and a “hoax.” There’s the connection to Chris Krebs.

Did the supercomputer at the University of Pennsylvania host Hammer and Scorecard? Will we be presented with proof that the University of Pennsylvania’s supercomputer was utilized to switch votes from Trump to Biden? Did staff at the University of Pennsylvania lose their security clearance because election fraud originated there? Is the connection to Chinese funding at the Penn Biden Center connected to election fraud? Does this constitute foreign interference in our elections?

Another interesting piece of the Miles Taylor Fact Sheet was Taylor’s claim that a government “resistance” was present at the Department of Homeland Security. Taylor allegedly leaked classified information to promote his book, Blowback. The directive questions whether Taylor’s conduct could be considered treasonous and a violation of the Espionage Act.

What confused me was the statement in the Fact Sheet that said, “While serving as an administrative staff assistant at the Department of Homeland Security, Taylor stoked dissension by manufacturing sensationalist reports on the existence of a supposed “resistance” within the Federal Government that “vowed” to undermine and render ineffective a sitting President.” Is President Trump telling us there wasn’t a resistance movement during his first term or am I misunderstanding this statement? We saw the resistance for ourselves. Rich Higgins’ book The Memo says, “These people were serious, and they were active. They genuinely thought of themselves as heroic; “the Resistance.” Doesn’t that explain exactly how Miles Taylor described himself and the other “adults in the room?”

The media is once again displaying their fake moral outrage about President Trump issuing these presidential directives against Krebs and Taylor. An MSNBC article accused President Trump of authoritarian tactics for issuing orders against two men who reportedly defied him. The article defends Krebs and Taylor saying that there was barely a pretense that they had done anything wrong, and “the closer one looked at the stated rationales in support of the directives, the more ridiculous they appeared.” The enemy of The People strikes again.

The New York Times’ Jonathan Swan asked the White House to defend President Trump’s actions in issuing the directives. The question was whether President Trump abused his power by directing the Justice Department to pursue a named individual who “did nothing wrong, but who the president doesn’t like.” The article fails to explain how they know that the men did nothing wrong. The White House spokesperson responded with a version of, “because he can,” which amused me.

If you were a curious normie, wouldn’t you wonder why President Trump specifically called these two people out? If you were inclined to do a little digging into who they are you’d find that Chris Krebs was involved in elections and Miles Taylor was a DHS insider who leaked classified information.

In an interview with Jen Psaki in December 2023, Taylor announced that the Department of Homeland Security had given him authorization to discuss what he referred to as the Doomsday Book. According to Taylor, the book is to be used in times of foreign invasion or some other type of catastrophic event in the country. The book contains the president’s emergency powers which are not widely known to the rest of us. With a sense of doom, Taylor says that the president could use those powers for political purposes to wield power to help his allies and hurt his enemies.

“He could invoke powers we've never heard a president of the United States invoke potentially to shut down companies, or turn off the internet, or deploy the U.S. military on U.S. soil.”

Turn off the internet? If you’ve read my paper on IP Addresses or my theory of what took place on January 6th, you’ll understand why this statement caught my attention. I still believe the time will come when the Patriots will take over our communication systems to calm and inform the American people of what we need to learn. Might there also be a time when it becomes necessary for the military to be deployed on U.S. soil? What if we’re told that a supercomputer in America, at the University of Pennsylvania, with funding from China, flipped votes from a President the people chose, to a President that China chose? What if it also flipped votes for members of Congress who are currently in office? Would that warrant military protection of our country?

One of the most brilliant things Donald Trump did up to and after he announced he was running for President was make everyone underestimate him. The arrogant media and our government officials were convinced he was a bumbling fool that they could easily manipulate. They underestimated him and didn’t see what hit them. It was a brilliant plan.

There is only one area that most Americans still believe has honor and integrity. The military is the only area that has earned and deserves our respect. TV generals and officers in drag are a thing of the past. If our military were to step forward and show the people what most of us already suspect, it should eliminate any doubt. I imagine an overwhelming surge of pride in our military and our country, and an awakening of the greatness to come. Everything President Trump has said over the years will be proven true. “Trump was right about everything.” The Marxists will be faced with the knowledge that they lost and America will be reborn as a proud, noble, super power in the world.

The best really is yet to come.